< lieux d'éditions

PRETORIA

Lieu(x) d'éd.
CharField		 PRETORIA
Identifiant Heurist
PositiveIntegerField		Éditer sur Heurist
date de création
DateTimeField		 22 septembre 2025 19:07
date de modification
DateTimeField		 22 septembre 2025 19:07
modifié par
ForeignKey		admin_etl

Notice (99)

QUESTIONING REPUTATIONS. ESSAYS ON NINE ROMAN REPUBLICAN POLITICIANSQUINTUS MUCIUS SCAEVOLA ONCE AGAINQUOD DOLO MALO FACTUM ESSE DICATUR - EIN BELEG FUER CULPA - HAFTUNG IN DER LEX IRNITANA ?RATIONALITY AND IRRATIONALITY IN THE ANCIENT GREEK LAW OF PROCEDURERECEPTION (THE) OF INSTITUTES 3.19.19 IN FRANCERIFLESSIONI SUL PROBLEMA DELLA CONTINUITA DEL PENSIERO GIURIDICO ROMANO, TRA RISALENZA DI DISCIPLINE E MODERNITA DELLA LORO CONFIGURAZIONE TEORICA. IL CASO DEL PROCESSO ARCAICO PER LEGIS ACTIONESROMAN LAW AND THE CAUSA LEGITIMA FOR REPRISAL IN BARTOLUSROMAN PRIVATE LAW. A TRANSLATION BY ROLF DANNENBRING OF ROEMISCHES PRIVATRECHT (TENTH REV. ED.) BY MAX KASER.SENECAS MISSTRAUEN IN BRIEF UND SIEGELSOME PERIPHERAL ASPECTS OF THE SPEECH PRO CLUENTIOSUASOR LEGIS, LE VOTE DU PLEBISCITE CLAUDIENTALIO ESTO ANDERS BEKEKENTHE (LACK OF) PROTECTION OF BONA FIDE PLEDGEES IN CLASSICAL ROMAN LAWTHEOPHILUS AND THE "INCORPOREAL" HEIRTREBATIUS IN PALIMPSEST. NOTES ON CICERO AD FAMILIARES VII, 18ULPIAN'S PRAECEPTA IURIS AND THEIR ROLE IN SOUTH AFRICAN LAW. PART 1 : HISTORICAL CONTEXTUXORES CONSTRICTAEVERTAALVINDING AAN DE HAND VAN DE CODEX JUSTINIANUSVIS MAIOR AND VIS CUI RESISTI NON POTEST?VON COPIA ZUR KOPIE. COPIAM HABERE UND COPIAM SUI FACERE IN DEN DIGESTENWHO WAS DEPENDENT UPON WHOM ?ZUM DAMNUM INFECTUM IN DER LEX RUBRIA CAPUT 20 UND DEN DIGESTEN, ULPIAN 39, 2, 4ZUR MITTELBAREN INIURIA”GRAVE EST FIDEM FALLERE” : VERTRAUENSSCHUTZ IM ROEMISCHEN RECHT